
Monita Secreta
Anti-Jesuit Fabrication Case
CLASSIFICATION: Financial Crime
LOCATION
Kraków, Poland
TIME PERIOD
1614-1615
VICTIMS
0 confirmed
The Monita Secreta, an alleged document purporting to be secret instructions from Claudio Acquaviva, the fifth general of the Society of Jesus, was first published in Kraków in 1615. The text outlines purported strategies for the Jesuit Order to amass wealth and influence, including the manipulation of young men and wealthy widows, as well as discrediting rival religious orders. Scholars widely believe the document to be a forgery, attributed to Jerome Zahorowski, a former Jesuit expelled in 1613. The authenticity of the Monita has been debated since its publication, with various historical figures and scholars arguing against its legitimacy, labeling it as an anti-Jesuit fabrication. The current status of the document remains as a controversial piece of literature within Jesuit studies, with no resolution regarding its authenticity.
The Monita Secreta is believed by some to be a genuine set of secret instructions from the Jesuit Order aimed at expanding their influence and wealth through manipulative practices. Others argue it is an anti-Jesuit forgery created by Jerome Zahorowski, a disgraced former member, to tarnish the Society's reputation. The document's origins and the various stories surrounding its discovery have led to speculation about its authenticity and purpose, with many attributing its publication to political motives against the Jesuits.
The Monita Secreta: A Controversial Chronicle
In the shadowy annals of history, whispers often linger longer than facts. One such whisper is the "Monita Secreta," also known as the "Secret Instructions of the Jesuits." This alleged code of clandestine directives was purportedly issued by Claudio Acquaviva, the fifth general of the Society of Jesus, to its leaders with a single purpose: to expand the Jesuit Order’s power and influence globally. However, many scholars argue that this document is nothing more than an elaborate anti-Jesuit forgery.
Unveiling the Instructions
According to the Monita Secreta, the Jesuits were instructed to use any means necessary to amass wealth for their order. The text suggests that promising young men should be lured into joining the Jesuits, bringing their estates with them. Rich widows were to be convinced to remain unmarried, while efforts were to be made to elevate Jesuits to positions of ecclesiastical power. Simultaneously, they were to discredit members of other religious orders, all while maintaining an outward appearance of selfless virtue. Those who left the order were to be maligned relentlessly.
The Murky Origins
The suspected author of the Monita Secreta is Jerome Zahorowski, a disgruntled former Jesuit from Poland who was expelled from the society in 1613 for disciplinary reasons. The document first emerged in print in Kraków in 1615, claiming to be a translation from Spanish, though it was printed a year earlier in Kraków. The narrative surrounding its discovery is as varied as it is mysterious, with tales linking it to Duke Christian of Brunswick, who, at the time of the document's alleged discovery, was merely a teenager. Other stories place its origins in locales such as Paderborn, Prague, Liège, Antwerp, Glatz, and even aboard a captured East Indiaman.
Interest in the Monita Secreta was periodically revived, even as late as 1783, with claims of new discoveries. An undated edition from the early nineteenth century purported to originate from the Propaganda Press, allegedly authenticated by various Jesuit authorities. However, this edition was attributed to a general named "Felix Aconiti," a figure unknown in Jesuit history. The censor approving this publication was named "Pasquinelli," and the titles within the text included a host of crimes and immoralities often attributed to the Jesuits by their fiercest adversaries.
The Authenticity Debate
The authenticity of the Monita Secreta has been hotly contested. Voices challenging its legitimacy include Bishop Lipski of Cracow (1616), historian Bernhard Duhr, Fra Paolo Sarpi, historian of the Council of Trent, Antoine Arnauld, the Jansenists Henri de Saint-Ignace and Blaise Pascal, von Lang, Johann Joseph Ignaz von Döllinger, Friedrich (author of "Janus"), Huber, Reusch, and Protestant historian Johann Karl Ludwig Gieseler. During debates on Catholic Emancipation in the British House of Commons, several speakers acknowledged the document's fraudulent nature. The British Museum and French bibliographer M. Barbier also classified it as apocryphal.
Despite these assertions, Anglican Bishop of London Henry Compton, a staunch opponent of Roman Catholicism, published an English translation of the Secret Instructions in 1669. Meanwhile, Richard Frederick Littledale, a critic of Roman Catholicism, argued in his 1881 Encyclopædia Britannica article that although the Monita Secreta was a caricature and libel, it was "substantially true," claiming it reflected the actual practices of the Jesuits.
In contrast, John Gerard, writing in the Catholic Encyclopedia, refuted these claims, arguing that the official Jesuit rules and constitutions directly contradicted the supposed instructions. He emphasized that genuine private instructions often fell into hostile hands and frequently contradicted the Monita. James Bernauer even drew parallels between the Monita Secreta and the discredited "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," noting the libelous nature of both texts.
Sources
- Healy, Roisin (1969), "The Jesuit Specter in Imperial Germany", Brill Press, p. 182, ISBN 0-391-04194-0
- Pavone, Sabina (2005), "The Wily Jesuits and the Monita Secreta", Institute of Jesuit Sources, p. 10, ISBN 1880810603
- Gerard, John. "Monita Secreta." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. 10 June 2016
- Gerard, John (1911). "Monita Secreta". Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10.
- Bernauer, James. "From European Anti-Jesuitism to German Anti-Jewishness: A Tale of Two Texts" presented at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland (March 5, 2009)
- Macaulay, Thomas Babington (1878). "The History of England from the Accession of James II". Vol. II. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 76.
For further reading, visit the Wikipedia page: Monita Secreta.
No Recent News
No recent news articles found for this case. Check back later for updates.
No Evidence Submitted
No evidence found for this case. Be the first to submit evidence in the comments below.
Join the discussion
Loading comments...
First Publication
The Monita Secreta is first printed in Kraków, claiming to be a translation from Spanish.
Wider Release
The Monita Secreta is published again in Kraków, gaining more attention and controversy.
Bishop's Opposition
Bishop Lipski of Cracow publicly argues against the authenticity of the Monita Secreta.
English Translation
Anglican Bishop Henry Compton publishes an English translation of the Monita Secreta.
Renewed Interest
Attempts are made to revive interest in the Monita Secreta, claiming new discoveries.
Defense Published
Richard Frederick Littledale defends the Monita Secreta in the Encyclopædia Britannica, claiming it has elements of truth.
Catholic Encyclopedia
John Gerard argues against the authorship of the Monita Secreta in the Catholic Encyclopedia.
Comparative Analysis
James Bernauer presents a comparison between the Monita Secreta and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The Monita Secreta, an alleged document purporting to be secret instructions from Claudio Acquaviva, the fifth general of the Society of Jesus, was first published in Kraków in 1615. The text outlines purported strategies for the Jesuit Order to amass wealth and influence, including the manipulation of young men and wealthy widows, as well as discrediting rival religious orders. Scholars widely believe the document to be a forgery, attributed to Jerome Zahorowski, a former Jesuit expelled in 1613. The authenticity of the Monita has been debated since its publication, with various historical figures and scholars arguing against its legitimacy, labeling it as an anti-Jesuit fabrication. The current status of the document remains as a controversial piece of literature within Jesuit studies, with no resolution regarding its authenticity.
The Monita Secreta is believed by some to be a genuine set of secret instructions from the Jesuit Order aimed at expanding their influence and wealth through manipulative practices. Others argue it is an anti-Jesuit forgery created by Jerome Zahorowski, a disgraced former member, to tarnish the Society's reputation. The document's origins and the various stories surrounding its discovery have led to speculation about its authenticity and purpose, with many attributing its publication to political motives against the Jesuits.
The Monita Secreta: A Controversial Chronicle
In the shadowy annals of history, whispers often linger longer than facts. One such whisper is the "Monita Secreta," also known as the "Secret Instructions of the Jesuits." This alleged code of clandestine directives was purportedly issued by Claudio Acquaviva, the fifth general of the Society of Jesus, to its leaders with a single purpose: to expand the Jesuit Order’s power and influence globally. However, many scholars argue that this document is nothing more than an elaborate anti-Jesuit forgery.
Unveiling the Instructions
According to the Monita Secreta, the Jesuits were instructed to use any means necessary to amass wealth for their order. The text suggests that promising young men should be lured into joining the Jesuits, bringing their estates with them. Rich widows were to be convinced to remain unmarried, while efforts were to be made to elevate Jesuits to positions of ecclesiastical power. Simultaneously, they were to discredit members of other religious orders, all while maintaining an outward appearance of selfless virtue. Those who left the order were to be maligned relentlessly.
The Murky Origins
The suspected author of the Monita Secreta is Jerome Zahorowski, a disgruntled former Jesuit from Poland who was expelled from the society in 1613 for disciplinary reasons. The document first emerged in print in Kraków in 1615, claiming to be a translation from Spanish, though it was printed a year earlier in Kraków. The narrative surrounding its discovery is as varied as it is mysterious, with tales linking it to Duke Christian of Brunswick, who, at the time of the document's alleged discovery, was merely a teenager. Other stories place its origins in locales such as Paderborn, Prague, Liège, Antwerp, Glatz, and even aboard a captured East Indiaman.
Interest in the Monita Secreta was periodically revived, even as late as 1783, with claims of new discoveries. An undated edition from the early nineteenth century purported to originate from the Propaganda Press, allegedly authenticated by various Jesuit authorities. However, this edition was attributed to a general named "Felix Aconiti," a figure unknown in Jesuit history. The censor approving this publication was named "Pasquinelli," and the titles within the text included a host of crimes and immoralities often attributed to the Jesuits by their fiercest adversaries.
The Authenticity Debate
The authenticity of the Monita Secreta has been hotly contested. Voices challenging its legitimacy include Bishop Lipski of Cracow (1616), historian Bernhard Duhr, Fra Paolo Sarpi, historian of the Council of Trent, Antoine Arnauld, the Jansenists Henri de Saint-Ignace and Blaise Pascal, von Lang, Johann Joseph Ignaz von Döllinger, Friedrich (author of "Janus"), Huber, Reusch, and Protestant historian Johann Karl Ludwig Gieseler. During debates on Catholic Emancipation in the British House of Commons, several speakers acknowledged the document's fraudulent nature. The British Museum and French bibliographer M. Barbier also classified it as apocryphal.
Despite these assertions, Anglican Bishop of London Henry Compton, a staunch opponent of Roman Catholicism, published an English translation of the Secret Instructions in 1669. Meanwhile, Richard Frederick Littledale, a critic of Roman Catholicism, argued in his 1881 Encyclopædia Britannica article that although the Monita Secreta was a caricature and libel, it was "substantially true," claiming it reflected the actual practices of the Jesuits.
In contrast, John Gerard, writing in the Catholic Encyclopedia, refuted these claims, arguing that the official Jesuit rules and constitutions directly contradicted the supposed instructions. He emphasized that genuine private instructions often fell into hostile hands and frequently contradicted the Monita. James Bernauer even drew parallels between the Monita Secreta and the discredited "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," noting the libelous nature of both texts.
Sources
- Healy, Roisin (1969), "The Jesuit Specter in Imperial Germany", Brill Press, p. 182, ISBN 0-391-04194-0
- Pavone, Sabina (2005), "The Wily Jesuits and the Monita Secreta", Institute of Jesuit Sources, p. 10, ISBN 1880810603
- Gerard, John. "Monita Secreta." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. 10 June 2016
- Gerard, John (1911). "Monita Secreta". Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10.
- Bernauer, James. "From European Anti-Jesuitism to German Anti-Jewishness: A Tale of Two Texts" presented at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland (March 5, 2009)
- Macaulay, Thomas Babington (1878). "The History of England from the Accession of James II". Vol. II. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 76.
For further reading, visit the Wikipedia page: Monita Secreta.
No Recent News
No recent news articles found for this case. Check back later for updates.
No Evidence Submitted
No evidence found for this case. Be the first to submit evidence in the comments below.
Join the discussion
Loading comments...
First Publication
The Monita Secreta is first printed in Kraków, claiming to be a translation from Spanish.
Wider Release
The Monita Secreta is published again in Kraków, gaining more attention and controversy.
Bishop's Opposition
Bishop Lipski of Cracow publicly argues against the authenticity of the Monita Secreta.
English Translation
Anglican Bishop Henry Compton publishes an English translation of the Monita Secreta.
Renewed Interest
Attempts are made to revive interest in the Monita Secreta, claiming new discoveries.
Defense Published
Richard Frederick Littledale defends the Monita Secreta in the Encyclopædia Britannica, claiming it has elements of truth.
Catholic Encyclopedia
John Gerard argues against the authorship of the Monita Secreta in the Catholic Encyclopedia.
Comparative Analysis
James Bernauer presents a comparison between the Monita Secreta and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.